theladyrose: (Default)
theladyrose ([personal profile] theladyrose) wrote2008-10-05 12:20 am
Entry tags:

don't drink and derive; know your limits

If you look at my record, I'm incredibly boring.

Believe it or not, I've drunk half a shot of vodka in my entire time at USC. My record was five glasses of wine on a full stomach this past summer over the course of an evening, and if you look at any photos from that night in Florence you'll see that I don't experience the "Asian glow" or act plastered. I've never been drunk and never intend to. I don't consume coffee except for those two iced granita caffés at that place right by the Pantheon in Rome this past summer. I don't smoke or sniff or shoot up or pop pills; I take no prescription medications. Believe it or not, I actually prefer to avoid anesthesia when possible during dental procedures; besides which, my dentist is a Bruin and I don't trust him with injecting me with painkillers. I'm kidding about that latter part, although we needle each other endlessly about the crosstown rivalry during my dental cleanings. I've been avoiding meat for nearly four years now, although unfortunately I don't have the willpower to cut out seafood or dairy.

Because of these habits, people tend to mistakenly assume that I'm really conservative and super religious. Nothing could be further than the truth, though I'm not one of those new age "I refuse to consume anything that ruins the sanctity of the temple that is my body" people. I like refined sugar and french fries too much to ever give those up completely!

I've been a secular humanist for many years now, though I respect and admire the religious beliefs of those I know; I don't have the courage, at least at this stage in my life, to make that leap of faith. At the same time, I don't judge people who take drugs as immoral. I do believe that medical marijuana should be legalized and find "just say no" education to be ridiculous, even if it happened to work for me. My general philosophy is that as long as you're not endangering your own health or those around you, then I respect your choices. I get frustrated, though, when people force others to bear the burden of what's their responsibility.

Blasting music so loudly that the people next door can't get to sleep at 1 AM on a Thursday - believe it or not, that's a problem because *some* of us actually have to get to work/class early in the morning. Projectile puking on someone's floor - that's a problem. Stealing your roommate's pills and pretending that you didn't - that's a problem. Landing yourself in the hospital where you need your stomach pumped and worrying the shit out of your family and friends - that's a problem. Slapping your girlfriend because you get violent when drunk or forgetting to pick your kid up from school because you're that sloshed at 3 in the afternoon - that's a problem. If you get to the point when you inconvenience those around you, you need to change your habits.

I don't doubt that consuming certain substances in certain amounts can have beneficial effects. There are some compounds in a glass of red wine that seem to do good things for your health, although there are probably more beneficial things you could be doing for your health that don't involve drinking a glass a day - exercise, anyone? Drugs play a role in certain religious ceremonies in bringing about a transcendental state of consciousness; I can respect that people would take them in those circumstances. There's no way, though, that you could ever get me to try them; there are plenty of other ways of expanding my world view, thanks. The "it's OK for others but not for me" mentality smacks of self-righteousness and elitism, but I have legitimate reasons.

My problem is that I have a sense of what the worst case scenario looks like and frankly never want to put anyone else in a situation where they're forced to take care of me. I hate waiting around in hospitals not knowing what the outcome will be and can only hope that no one I know will find herself in the same agony waiting for me. It's more than that, though. When you evaluate therapy tapes involving alcoholics, heroin and crack addicts, you get a sobering taste of the ripple effect of damage from addiction can effect on multiple lives, even entire communities, in several generations. No behavior exists in a vacuum - you may own responsibility for an action, but you can't always control the effects of what you do on others. The potential for uncontrolled destruction is far too high - I don't trust myself to stop at the critical point (it took me three years to beat a pathological addiction to Spider Solitaire in high school), so it's best to never reach the point where I have risky cravings in the first place. I don't miss out on drinking or trying pot or smoking because I've never been interested; it's as deceptively simple as that.

The truth is, my aversion to alcohol has more to do with an unrepressable association with abuse. I don't know if I'll ever be able to overcome my ambivalence towards the alcoholic in my life - and no, that alcoholic is not one of my parents. I derive my strength to resist from my inability to completely forgive that person because that would legitimize the pain that was inflicted in someone I love. So be it.

[identity profile] theladyrose.livejournal.com 2008-10-06 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for reminding me that I am a bad non-meat eater. Unfortunately I can't resist dim sum, and when I was stealing from you at study nights last spring I actually got a fried ball of batter, which doesn't count (OK, the intention does, but I rationalize it as just one piece because I was having a craving for something fried at the time). So I guess it would be more accurate to call myself flexitarian, which is something of a cop-out.

You bring up a good point about how people-pleasing can be problematic on the other extreme; how much you should change is a matter of degree. Unfortunately I have a tendency to think of extreme situations as an excuse not to do things (clinical psychology has brainwashed me). Although for the specific example you gave, you could always give your roommate earplugs or try those nose pad things that supposedly open up your nasal passages so that you don't snore.

When's a good time for you to Skype?

[identity profile] laleia.livejournal.com 2008-10-07 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
The roommate situation is sort of hypothetical -- it happened to a friend of mine who started buying strips that cost essentially $2/night (which adds up) to reduce her snoring, and I thought that was ridiculous. At what point does it become the other roommate's problem for being such a light sleeper? Never?

Also, Wednesday and Thursday mornings here (Tuesday nights and Wednesday nights where you are) work for me currently, as well as this weekend I suppose ...

[identity profile] theladyrose.livejournal.com 2008-10-09 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
It depends on the degree of snoring - if the snorer has sleep apnea, then it's a serious health problem that's not just the roommate being a whiny light sleeper. I'd try the earplugs for the other roommate first, though; they're pretty cheap.

This weekend would be good - any particular time?